SHIVM Stock Valuation 2026 — Is Shivam Cement Worth Buying
Introduction
Company Overview
Financial Snapshot
|
Particulars (In
Crore) |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
2025 |
|
Cash Flow from
Operating Activities (CFO) |
159.73 |
295.62 |
299.45 |
223.82 |
106.53 |
117.67 |
76.73 |
171.87 |
|
Add: Interest
Expenses (Net of Tax) |
29.35 |
27.71 |
12.07 |
2.12 |
5.23 |
7.73 |
3.81 |
0.52 |
|
Less: Fixed
Capital Investment |
113.49 |
33.49 |
15.88 |
35.85 |
44.06 |
12.25 |
20.60 |
53.95 |
|
Free Cash Flow
to Firm (FCFF) |
75.59 |
289.84 |
295.64 |
190.09 |
67.70 |
113.15 |
59.93 |
118.44 |
|
Less: Net
Borrowing |
429.77 |
181.48 |
24.50 |
67.88 |
62.17 |
37.30 |
7.32 |
1.02 |
|
Less: Interest
Expenses |
29.35 |
27.71 |
12.07 |
2.12 |
5.23 |
7.73 |
3.81 |
0.52 |
|
Free Cash Flow
to Equity (FCFE) |
476.01 |
443.61 |
308.07 |
255.85 |
124.64 |
142.71 |
63.45 |
118.93 |
|
Number of
Outstanding Shares |
3.87 |
4.40 |
4.40 |
4.40 |
4.40 |
4.40 |
5.03 |
5.46 |
|
FCFF per share |
19.52 |
65.87 |
67.19 |
43.20 |
15.39 |
25.72 |
11.92 |
21.70 |
|
FCFE per share |
122.94 |
100.82 |
70.02 |
58.15 |
28.33 |
32.43 |
12.62 |
21.80 |
|
CFO per share |
41.25 |
67.19 |
68.06 |
50.87 |
24.21 |
26.74 |
15.26 |
31.50 |
Revenue Analysis
|
Year (Amount
in ‘000) |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
2025 |
|
Revenue from
Cement Sales |
1,016.49 |
1,112.11 |
878.70 |
923.53 |
890.59 |
767.01 |
768.27 |
775.24 |
|
Revenue from
Clinker Sales |
0.00 |
- |
0.48 |
- |
- |
6.01 |
1.74 |
2.43 |
|
Revenue from
Limestone Sales |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Other Operating
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue From
Trading Sales |
8.90 |
20.81 |
21.71 |
37.30 |
34.34 |
1.18 |
0.05 |
0.45 |
|
Revenue From
Scrap Sales |
1.12 |
1.59 |
0.01 |
0.71 |
1.10 |
1.07 |
0.46 |
0.46 |
|
Revenue From
Service Sales |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total Revenue |
1,026.51 |
1,134.51 |
900.91 |
961.54 |
926.04 |
775.26 |
770.52 |
778.57 |
Relative Valuation (RV)
|
Symbol |
EPS Annualized |
P/E |
Relative P/E Valuation |
Book Value |
P/B |
Relative P/B Valuation |
Final PE/PB Valuation |
LTP |
Difference |
Remarks |
|
23.04.2026 |
||||||||||
|
BNL |
19.27 |
796.57 |
970.77 |
3201.17 |
4.80 |
21769.60 |
11370.18 |
15350 |
-3979.82 |
Premium |
|
BNT |
223.96 |
51.37 |
11282.47 |
3021.55 |
3.81 |
20548.09 |
15915.28 |
11505 |
4410.28 |
Discount |
|
GCIL |
-5.27 |
-82.54 |
-265.49 |
166.58 |
2.61 |
1132.83 |
433.67 |
435 |
-1.33 |
Premium |
|
HDL |
24.31 |
47.26 |
1224.67 |
120.87 |
9.51 |
821.98 |
1023.32 |
1149 |
-125.68 |
Premium |
|
NLO |
48.25 |
5.58 |
2430.70 |
507.62 |
0.53 |
3452.09 |
2941.39 |
269.4 |
2671.99 |
Discount |
|
OMPL |
-12.81 |
-93.43 |
-645.33 |
97.93 |
12.22 |
665.97 |
10.32 |
1196.9 |
-1186.58 |
Premium |
|
RSML |
16.08 |
268.66 |
810.06 |
490.58 |
8.81 |
3336.20 |
2073.13 |
4320 |
-2246.87 |
Premium |
|
SAGAR |
-7.21 |
-244.11 |
-363.22 |
128.34 |
13.71 |
872.78 |
254.78 |
1760 |
-1505.22 |
Premium |
|
SARBTM |
20.61 |
41.15 |
1038.27 |
188.92 |
4.49 |
1284.75 |
1161.51 |
848 |
313.51 |
Discount |
|
SAIL |
1.92 |
604.69 |
96.72 |
110.63 |
10.49 |
752.34 |
424.53 |
1161 |
-736.47 |
Premium |
|
SONA |
3.09 |
142.39 |
155.67 |
191.42 |
2.30 |
1301.75 |
728.71 |
440 |
288.71 |
Discount |
|
SHIVM |
9.66 |
69.67 |
486.64 |
180.38 |
3.73 |
1226.68 |
856.66 |
673 |
183.66 |
Discount |
|
SYPNL |
1.20 |
1333.33 |
60.45 |
109.64 |
14.59 |
745.61 |
403.03 |
1600 |
-1196.97 |
Premium |
|
UNL |
935.94 |
49.38 |
47149.98 |
4627.69 |
9.99 |
31470.66 |
39310.32 |
46220 |
-6909.68 |
Premium |
|
Median |
50.4 |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
Relative valuation is inherently short-term and heavily dependent on current
earnings, book values, and valuation multiples of peer companies, all of which
can change quickly due to market conditions, competition, or sector-wide
shifts. Since it does not incorporate long-term growth prospects, future risks,
or company-specific developments, relative valuation should be viewed as a
directional indicator rather than a standalone investment decision tool.
Dupont Analysis
|
Particulars |
Formula |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
2025 |
|
Tax Burden |
Net Profit / Pre-Tax Income |
87.68% |
85.49% |
91.33% |
92.63% |
91.30% |
|
Asset Turnover |
Revenue / Avg. Total Assets |
0.66x |
0.66x |
0.58x |
0.57x |
0.53x |
|
Financial Leverage |
Avg. Total Assets / Avg. Equity |
1.28 |
1.27 |
1.24 |
1.23 |
1.19 |
|
Interest Burden |
Pre-tax Income/ Operating Income |
118.19% |
135.74% |
114.16% |
101.42% |
137.11% |
|
Operating Margin |
Operating Income/ Revenue |
17.61% |
8.79% |
8.37% |
3.87% |
12.32% |
|
Return on Equity (ROE) |
17.65% |
7.20% |
5.56% |
3.44% |
11.60% |
|
Altman Z-Score
|
Ratio |
Weight |
2021 |
% |
2022 |
% |
2023 |
% |
2024 |
% |
2025 |
% |
|
EBIT / Total
Assets |
3.3 |
11.75% |
39% |
6.29% |
21% |
5.57% |
18% |
2.56% |
8% |
6.59% |
22% |
|
Net Sales /
Total assets |
1.0 |
66% |
66% |
66% |
66% |
58% |
58% |
57% |
57% |
53% |
53% |
|
Book Value
of Equity / Total Liabilities |
0.6 |
3.54 |
213% |
3.73 |
224% |
4.19 |
251% |
4.41 |
264% |
5.31 |
318% |
|
Working
Capital / Total Assets |
1.2 |
0.18 |
22% |
18.13% |
22% |
11.24% |
13% |
9.41% |
11% |
7.20% |
9% |
|
Retained
Earnings / Total Assets |
1.4 |
38.26% |
54% |
35.89% |
50% |
35.73% |
50% |
31.66% |
44% |
35.30% |
49% |
|
Altman
Z-Score |
3.93 |
3.83 |
3.91 |
3.86 |
4.51 |
||||||
|
Average |
4.03 |
||||||||||
Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
The Dividend Discount Model (DDM) is a quantitative method used to estimate the intrinsic value of a company's stock. It is based on the idea that a stock's value is equal to the present value of all of its future dividend payments. To put it simply, DDM views a stock as a sequence of future cash flows rather than market hype or erratic price fluctuations. Investors can ascertain if a stock is now overpriced or undervalued by "discounting" these future rewards back to current cash using a needed rate of return.
|
Shivam Cement
Limited (SHIVM) |
|||||
|
SN |
Year |
C. Dividend |
EPS |
Retention Ratio |
ROE |
|
1 |
2018 |
15.780 |
35.14 |
55.10% |
20.05% |
|
2 |
2019 |
15.780 |
51.49 |
69.36% |
23.39% |
|
3 |
2020 |
24.210 |
35.75 |
32.27% |
15.05% |
|
4 |
2021 |
29.000 |
45.79 |
36.67% |
17.65% |
|
5 |
2022 |
10.530 |
18.06 |
41.69% |
7.20% |
|
6 |
2023 |
0.750 |
13.69 |
94.52% |
5.56% |
|
7 |
2024 |
0.450 |
7.54 |
94.03% |
3.44% |
|
8 |
2025 |
10.000 |
26.20 |
61.83% |
11.60% |
|
Average |
13.313 |
29.21 |
60.68% |
12.99% |
|
|
Dividend
Projections |
|||
|
SN |
FY |
Dividends |
PV |
|
0.5 |
2026 |
13.83 |
13.00 |
|
1.5 |
2027 |
14.92 |
12.81 |
|
2.5 |
2028 |
16.09 |
12.49 |
|
3.5 |
2029 |
17.36 |
12.18 |
|
4.5 |
2030 |
18.73 |
11.87 |
|
5.5 |
2031 |
20.21 |
11.57 |
|
6.5 |
2032 |
21.80 |
11.28 |
|
Growth
Rate |
0.0788 |
||
|
Terminal
Rate |
0.037 |
||
|
Terminal
Value |
241.74 |
||
|
Present
Value of Terminal Value |
108.9 |
||
|
Sum of
all Present Values |
85.222 |
||
|
DDM
Valuation |
194.12 |
||
Based on anticipated dividend growth and a long-term sustainable growth rate of 3.70%, the DDM valuation of SHIVM projects an intrinsic value of around NPR 294 per share. A sustainable growth rate of around 7.88% in the medium term is implied by the model's incorporation of historical averages, such as an average dividend of NPR 13.31 per share, a retention ratio of 60.68%, and an average ROE of 12.99%.
From the standpoint of an income investor, the valuation indicates that SHIVM's ability to pay dividends on its own does not provide sufficient support for the company's present market price. Due to the company's vulnerability to industry conditions, dividend distribution has historically been cyclical and drastically decreased during years of lower profitability. The idea that the market is valuing the firm more on growth and recovery prospects than on steady dividend yield fundamentals is therefore reinforced by the fact that SHIVM appears to be valued substantially beyond the value justified solely by projected future cash distributions within a dividend-focused framework.
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
Key Assumptions:
|
Particulars |
Value |
Remarks |
|
Adjusted
Beta (β) |
1.21 |
The raw weekly beta of 1.32 of the 5-year
will move towards the market beta of 1 over time. |
|
Market
Return (Rm) |
11.60% |
CAGR of closing prices of NEPSE from FY
2001/02 to FY 2024/25 |
|
Risk-Free
Rate (Rf) |
3.25% |
Average Development Bond Rate for FY 82-83
adjusted for a tax rate of 6.00% |
|
Cost
of Equity (Ke) |
13.38% |
As per the CAPM Model |
|
Cost
of Debt (Kd) |
7.88% |
As per the average monthly lending rates of
commercial banks since February 2014 (adjusted as per tax rate) |
|
Tax
Rate |
20% |
As per the annual report |
|
WACC |
13.05% |
Discount rate for the valuation (based on
equity 94% and debt 6% in its capital structure as per Q2 82/83) |
|
Capacity Utilization |
2026 |
2027 |
2028 |
2029 |
2030 |
2031 |
2032 |
|
Base case |
72.75% |
74.32% |
75.64% |
76.97% |
78.34% |
79.72% |
79.72% |
|
Best case |
74.96% |
76.65% |
78.35% |
79.84% |
81.37% |
82.92% |
84.51% |
|
Worst case |
69.96% |
71.20% |
72.39% |
73.61% |
74.84% |
73.61% |
73.61% |
· The Terminal Growth Rate has been assumed at 3.70%,
based on the average of historical and projected GDP growth rates.
· Cement Per Bag Price to be increased by 5% in
base case, 6.5% in best case, and 3.5% in worst case.
· Admin Exp projected to be 3.98% of total
revenue.
· Depreciation expense to be 4.06% of total
revenue.
· Selling & Distribution expenses to be
8.11% of total revenue in base case, 7.70% in best case, and 8.70% in worst
case.
· Other Income, which consists of dividends
from subsidiaries and interest, is projected at 5% of total revenue in the base
case, 8% in the best case, and 3% in the worst case.
· CAPEX has been assumed at NPR 260,430,536.10,
based on the average of the past three years.
· Investment in PRVUPO has been considered at
NPR 100 per share for 1,120,000 units, totaling NPR 112,000,000.00.
· Investment in HLICF Mutual Fund has been
considered at NPR 10 per unit for 25,000,000 units, amounting to NPR
250,000,000.00
· Investment in SHIVAM HOLDINGS has been
considered at NPR 100 per share for 39,452,088 units, totaling NPR
3,945,208,800.00. This amount has been incorporated post-valuation of SHIVM as
an adjustment to arrive at the final valuation of SHIVM, including the
investment in Shivam Holdings.
DCF Valuation & Interpretations:
|
Base Case
Valuation (Amount in NPR million) |
||||||||||
|
Year |
Revenue |
COGS |
Other Income |
Selling &
Admin Exp |
EBITDA |
CAPEX |
Working Capital |
FCFF |
WACC |
PV |
|
2026 |
8,761.70 |
6,322.64 |
438.08 |
1,059.00 |
2,173.84 |
260.43 |
(211.64) |
1,338.15 |
13.05% |
1,258.54 |
|
2027 |
9,398.08 |
6,781.87 |
469.90 |
1,135.92 |
2,331.74 |
260.43 |
1.00 |
1,682.27 |
13.05% |
1,399.54 |
|
2028 |
10,042.64 |
7,247.00 |
502.13 |
1,213.83 |
2,491.66 |
260.43 |
(86.82) |
1,727.61 |
13.05% |
1,271.35 |
|
2029 |
10,731.41 |
7,744.02 |
536.57 |
1,297.08 |
2,662.54 |
260.43 |
(92.78) |
1,863.96 |
13.05% |
1,213.34 |
|
2030 |
11,467.41 |
8,275.14 |
573.37 |
1,386.03 |
2,845.15 |
260.43 |
(99.14) |
2,009.66 |
13.05% |
1,157.17 |
|
2031 |
12,253.89 |
8,842.68 |
612.69 |
1,481.09 |
3,040.28 |
260.43 |
(105.94) |
2,165.35 |
13.05% |
1,102.89 |
|
2032 |
12,866.59 |
9,284.82 |
643.33 |
1,555.15 |
3,192.30 |
260.43 |
(82.53) |
2,315.35 |
13.05% |
1,043.15 |
An estimated intrinsic equity value of around NPR 342 per share is obtained from the base case DCF valuation of SHIVM. The adjusted fair value rises to about NPR 413.16 per share after accounting for the value of its strategic interests, such as stakes in Shivam stakes and other financial assets inherent worth in a range of operational circumstances. The estimated fair value in the base scenario is NPR 342.62 per share; after accounting for Shivam Holdings' worth, it rises to NPR 413.16.
|
Particulars |
Amount (in
NPR million) |
|
Terminal Growth
Rate |
3.70% |
|
Terminal Value |
25,663.17 |
|
PV of TV |
11,562.21 |
|
Sum of all PV of
FCFF |
8,445.99 |
|
Total Debt |
651.72 |
|
Cash and cash
equivalents |
725.31 |
|
Contingent
Liabilities with NEA |
1,276.15 |
|
Marketable
Securities of PRVUPO |
112.00 |
|
Mutual Fund
Investment in HLICF |
250.00 |
|
Total No. of
shares |
55,932,287 |
|
Total Value of
the SHIVM |
19,148.90 |
|
Value per Share |
342.62 |
|
Investment in
Shivam Holdings * |
3,945.21 |
|
Value per Share
after adjusting for investment in Shivam Holdings |
413.16 |
The DCF-derived value shows a significant premium in the trading price as compared to the current market price of around NPR 673. The stock is trading much above its base case intrinsic value estimate even after accounting for investment assets. This suggests that the market may be accounting for better capacity utilisation, greater profits recovery, increased pricing power, or a lower effective risk premium than the model predicts.
In conclusion, SHIVM seems overpriced from a DCF standpoint under the base case predictions, with the current market price reflecting more positive forward expectations than those included in the valuation model.
|
Scenerio |
Valuation |
Adj. Shivm
Holdings |
|
Base Case |
342.62 |
413.16 |
|
Best Case |
525.92 |
596.46 |
|
Worst Case |
215.18 |
285.71 |
|
Median |
361.24 |
431.78 |
SHIVM's scenario-based DCF valuation offers an organised perspective on intrinsic value under various operating circumstances. The estimated fair value in the basic scenario is NPR 342.62 per share, which rises to NPR 413.16 when Shivam Holdings' worth is taken into account.
The value increases to NPR 525.92 (or NPR 596.46 adjusted) under a more optimistic best-case scenario, which reflects higher operational performance assumptions. In contrast, intrinsic value drops to NPR 215.88, or NPR 285.71 adjusted, in the worst-case scenario, indicating downside risk in a less favorable operating environment.
After adjustments, the median valuation across scenarios is NPR 431.78, or NPR 361.24, which can be considered an estimate of central tendency. Even the best-case adjusted valuation is still marginally below market levels when compared to the current market price of approximately NPR 673. This indicates that the stock is currently pricing in performance expectations at or above the model's optimistic scenario.
With a small margin of safety based on projected cash flow, the DCF scenario analysis generally shows that SHIVM is trading toward the upper end of its fundamental value range. Even in the best-case scenario, further upside would probably need operating results that surpass the underlying assumptions.